Situation
Goodfood Holdings needed to consolidate five banner websites — Metropolitan Market, Bristol Farms, New Seasons, New Leaf, and Lazy Acres — onto a single CMS platform to enable shared back-office operations. Each banner was running independently with no common tooling, processes, or content infrastructure.
Task
As Metropolitan Market's appointed representative, contribute to platform selection, vendor evaluation, and implementation — while protecting Met's more sophisticated digital requirements within a group decision-making process.
Action
I led stakeholder interviews across Metropolitan Market and co-authored a GFH wide requirements document separating MVP, fast-follow, and long-term features. That document became the foundation for an RFP distributed to 15 agencies — 8 submitted, 5 were interviewed, 3 reached finalist stage: Sagepath Reply, Laughlin Constable, and Deloitte Digital. Finalists bid against a detailed SOW. Sagepath Reply was selected on price via two rounds of ranked-choice voting. I did not favor the selected agency but supported the group decision.
The project kicked off with a week-long in-person discovery session in Carson, CA. Metropolitan Market shared complete, high-fidelity wireframes and a full design system prior to the onsite. It became apparent at the discovery meeting that Sagepath Reply had not reviewed them. The agency arrived pushing native, desktop-optimized vertical stacking — with no familiarity with the carded layout or slider components we had specified. What was a zero-cost build in WordPress was quoted as a $100K feature enhancement. Because the site architecture depended on it, we paid — but the framing as a custom feature rather than a reviewed deliverable was a red flag that proved accurate.
It became clear early that Met was the only banner with a defined digital vision — the others were optimizing for the easiest path forward rather than the best outcome. Phase one launched with Bristol Farms first, a decision that created cascading problems: the BF project lead departed before build began, design decisions were inconsistent and undocumented, and the launched site had broken links, incorrect breakpoints, improperly sized assets, and missing alt tags throughout. Constant scope changes at Bristol Farms and BFLA burned through the agency's overage budget. By the time Met went live — a year late and at three times the original budget — we elected a hybrid approach: Kentico as the core CMS framework, with ecommerce, reservations, and promotions continuing on WordPress. The other banners subsequently adopted Met's hybrid playbook.
Result
Metropolitan Market launched on Kentico on schedule relative to our revised timeline, with a functioning hybrid architecture that preserved our ecommerce and promotions capabilities. The hybrid approach we developed became the de facto model for the other banners. The project is an honest case study in cross-organizational governance: requirements discipline and a rigorous vendor process can only absorb so much misalignment downstream. What I could control, I made better for everyone.
Stack
Kentico · WordPress (hybrid) · Adobe XD · Smartsheet · Asana
Workflow
Stakeholder interviews → requirements doc (MVP / fast-follow / long-term) → RFP to 15 agencies → 5 interviews → 3 finalists (Sagepath Reply, Laughlin Constable, Deloitte Digital) → SOW → ranked-choice vendor selection → submitted wireframes and design system pre-onsite → week-long in-person discovery → negotiated carded layout implementation → phased banner implementation → hybrid architecture decision → Met launch → playbook adopted cross-banner → tracked in Smartsheet throughout